Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- arbeiten:comparing_annotation_tools [04.11.2020 11:40] – [Data-Entry] Andreas Schmid
+++ arbeiten:comparing_annotation_tools [04.05.2021 13:11] (aktuell) – [Data-Entry] Andreas Schmid
@@ Zeile 3: / Zeile 3: @@
 ---- dataentry StudentischeArbeit ----
 Thema                                  : Systematic Comparison of Annotation Tools
-Art_thesistypes                        : BA, MA, FPM
+Art_thesistypes                        : FPM
 BetreuerIn_thesisadvisor               : Andreas Schmid
-BearbeiterIn                           :
+BearbeiterIn                           : Florian Kaindl, Philipp Schauhuber
 ErstgutachterIn_thesisprofessor        :
 ZweitgutachterIn_secondthesisprofessor :
-Status_thesisstate                     : ausgeschrieben
+Status_thesisstate                     : abgeschlossen
 Stichworte_thesiskeywords              : Physical-Digital, Annotation, PDF, Paper
 angelegt_dt                            : 2020-11-03
@@ Zeile 14: / Zeile 14: @@
 Antrittsvortrag_dt                     :
 Abschlussvortrag_dt                    :
-Abgabe_dt                              :
+Abgabe_dt                              : 2021-04-15
 Textlizenz_textlicense                 :  # #Lizenz|##
 Codelizenz_codelicense                 :  # #Lizenz|##
 ----
 === Hintergrund ===
-TBD
+Annotating text documents is a common task among office workers.
+Besides the "classical" method of highlighting and taking notes on paper there is a variety of different tools, ranging from built-in functions of different PDF readers over annotating LaTeX source code (e.g. in [Overleaf](https://overleaf.com)) to emulating the paper-based process with tablet and stylus.
+Each of those techniques offers different affordances for users, making some types of annotation easier and others harder.
 === Zielsetzung der Arbeit ===
-TBD
+This work aims to find out to what extend the available tools of a certain annotation method influence which kinds of annotations are made and how many errors in a text are found.
+This includes creating an overview of existing annotation methods beforehand.
+In a controlled user study, representative annotation methods should be compared in terms of qualitative characteristics and error recall.
 === Konkrete Aufgaben ===
@@ Zeile 34: / Zeile 40: @@
 === Erwartete Vorkenntnisse ===
-TBD
+ * designing and conducting a user study
 === Weiterführende Quellen ===