Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_d:2019-03-12_writing_of_the_rebuttal [12.03.2019 10:15]
Julia Sageder Erstellt mit dem Formular lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_d
lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_d:2019-03-12_writing_of_the_rebuttal [12.03.2019 10:23] (aktuell)
Julia Sageder Bild hinzugefügt
Zeile 9: Zeile 9:
  
 To help to improve our paper, seven people took the time to write a review. For our rebuttal letter, we have worked out and listed all the points of criticism noted from these seven reviews (including the meta-review). Duplications were brought together, but always with a reference to all reviewers who raised this point. This list has been divided into categories for ease of reading, e.g. criticism regarding content, abstract or spelling. In a group conference, each of the points was talked about and it was discussed whether we regard the criticism as unjustified,​ misunderstood or justified. In the latter case, a solution or implementation of the point of criticism was debated. Finally, we formulated the points of criticism and answers to them for all reviewers in a rebuttal letter. Important for us to underline: we are still open to questions, criticism and discussions (of course especially about the Rebuttal) and would be pleased if we could improve our paper further through a constructive discourse. To help to improve our paper, seven people took the time to write a review. For our rebuttal letter, we have worked out and listed all the points of criticism noted from these seven reviews (including the meta-review). Duplications were brought together, but always with a reference to all reviewers who raised this point. This list has been divided into categories for ease of reading, e.g. criticism regarding content, abstract or spelling. In a group conference, each of the points was talked about and it was discussed whether we regard the criticism as unjustified,​ misunderstood or justified. In the latter case, a solution or implementation of the point of criticism was debated. Finally, we formulated the points of criticism and answers to them for all reviewers in a rebuttal letter. Important for us to underline: we are still open to questions, criticism and discussions (of course especially about the Rebuttal) and would be pleased if we could improve our paper further through a constructive discourse.
 +
 +{{ :​lehre:​ws18:​fsm_18ws:​group_d:​rebuttal.jpg?​600 |}}