Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

Link zu dieser Vergleichsansicht

Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung
Letzte ÜberarbeitungBeide Seiten der Revision
lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_f:2019-02-01_main_study [01.02.2019 00:19] hok10026lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_f:2019-02-01_main_study [01.02.2019 00:21] – [Conduction of main study] hok10026
Zeile 50: Zeile 50:
 Introduction: Introduction:
  
-How old are you? +  - How old are you? 
-What is your working environment? +  What is your working environment? 
-How long are you using your PC/Tablet/Smartphone in average a day? +  How long are you using your PC/Tablet/Smartphone in average a day? 
-How would you rate yourself as a multi media user? +  How would you rate yourself as a multi media user? 
-Which OS are you using and why? +  Which OS are you using and why? 
-Do you know what a file manager is? +  Do you know what a file manager is? 
-Which file manager are you using? +  Which file manager are you using? 
-What are your goals, when you use are using a file manager? +  What are your goals, when you use are using a file manager? 
-What are the key components of a file manager? +  What are the key components of a file manager? 
-Are you using any shortcuts?+  Are you using any shortcuts?
  
 ATI (Affinity for Technology Interaction) ATI (Affinity for Technology Interaction)
Zeile 65: Zeile 65:
 After User Tasks: After User Tasks:
  
-What was your first impressions of the respective file manager? +  - What was your first impressions of the respective file manager? 
-Which one would you like to use? +  Which one would you like to use? 
-What would you improve on the respective FM? +  What would you improve on the respective FM? 
-Could you imagine using a terminal based FM in the future (if yes, why)? +  Could you imagine using a terminal based FM in the future (if yes, why)? 
-Which FM is appealing the most esthetically?+  Which FM is appealing the most esthetically?
  
 For every group of OS (Windows, Linux, Mac) we had different orders, so we can avoid having the learning effect. This will be an important aspect of our analysis.  For every group of OS (Windows, Linux, Mac) we had different orders, so we can avoid having the learning effect. This will be an important aspect of our analysis. 
Zeile 83: Zeile 83:
 What we found out (without doing the evaluation and analysis yet): What we found out (without doing the evaluation and analysis yet):
  
-The normal Windows user are usually more used to the User Interfaces and functionality  +  - The normal Windows user are usually more used to the User Interfaces and functionality  
-Linux User are commonly more used to the Terminal than the other 2 +  Linux User are commonly more used to the Terminal than the other 2 
-The Mac Version was rather old, some people didn’t know exactly what they were doing since it was not the same as their own Mac (their technical affinity in general was not too good) +  The Mac Version was rather old, some people didn’t know exactly what they were doing since it was not the same as their own Mac (their technical affinity in general was not too good) 
-The tasks were repetitive, we changed some stuff within the tasks (e.g. looking for a certain file, we changed the file of course to avoid the learning effect), but the “core” tasks were identical  We needed the same conditions +  The tasks were repetitive, we changed some stuff within the tasks (e.g. looking for a certain file, we changed the file of course to avoid the learning effect), but the “core” tasks were identical  We needed the same conditions 
-Performance related, Linux and Windows people were generally faster than Mac user (rationally seen, without the evaluation and analysis) +  Performance related, Linux and Windows people were generally faster than Mac user (rationally seen, without the evaluation and analysis) 
-The standard Explorer was generally the best one in terms of performance, then the double commander and lastly the commandline +  The standard Explorer was generally the best one in terms of performance, then the double commander and lastly the commandline 
-If people were experienced in the CLI, they were really fast with navigating through the tasks, on the other hand if people were not experienced, you could see that they were struggling at the beginning but graduately got used to it and got faster in navigating +  If people were experienced in the CLI, they were really fast with navigating through the tasks, on the other hand if people were not experienced, you could see that they were struggling at the beginning but graduately got used to it and got faster in navigating 
-Some people were kinda nervous and didn’t want to try stuff themselves and kept asking the test supervisor for help  we did not help them too much, just telling them to try it, only if they really couldn’t solve it we would give them a hint what to do (mostly only on the commandline part) +  Some people were kinda nervous and didn’t want to try stuff themselves and kept asking the test supervisor for help  we did not help them too much, just telling them to try it, only if they really couldn’t solve it we would give them a hint what to do (mostly only on the commandline part) 
-People had no trouble to find the commands on the cheat sheet, but the usage of them were problematic for some (Usually it goes: Command, affected File and Path where the file should be moved/copy)  +  People had no trouble to find the commands on the cheat sheet, but the usage of them were problematic for some (Usually it goes: Command, affected File and Path where the file should be moved/copy)  
-Creating folders and moving files into certain folders were easily done by the most, but the most problems people had was to get information from files trough the terminal, most people were used to the graphical UI, so they had trouble to extract information from the terminal +  Creating folders and moving files into certain folders were easily done by the most, but the most problems people had was to get information from files trough the terminal, most people were used to the graphical UI, so they had trouble to extract information from the terminal 
-Most of the people didn’t bother to change anything from the default view (e.g. not using the Thumbnail view for selecting certain pictures) +  Most of the people didn’t bother to change anything from the default view (e.g. not using the Thumbnail view for selecting certain pictures) 
-• The double commander was missing some basic commands (mosty on linux and mac, people didn’t know how to create a text file, since on Windows you can right click and easily create a textfile and in general the dual pane wasn’t too well received)+  - Nummerierter ListenpunktThe double commander was missing some basic commands (mosty on linux and mac, people didn’t know how to create a text file, since on Windows you can right click and easily create a textfile and in general the dual pane wasn’t too well received)