Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g:2019-01-31_a_research_of_researches [31.01.2019 13:34] – scc64279 | lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g:2019-01-31_a_research_of_researches [01.02.2019 19:18] (aktuell) – typo fix scc64279 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 2: | Zeile 2: | ||
template | template | ||
title : A research of researches | title : A research of researches | ||
- | description | + | description |
date_date | date_date | ||
bygroup | bygroup | ||
Zeile 49: | Zeile 49: | ||
* " | * " | ||
- | For the retrieval of the publications we used the search engine on the websites of IEEE [[https:// | + | For the retrieval of the publications we used the search engine on the websites of[[https:// |
Based on this approach we found approximately 360 papers related to AR, where approximately 170 could be excluded, as they did not correspond to our paper definition or were not accessible for us, resulting in approximately 170 papers left for our analysis. During the analysis some papers will also be identified as false positives, i.e. they are not related with the topic of AR, although they met the keyword criteria. | Based on this approach we found approximately 360 papers related to AR, where approximately 170 could be excluded, as they did not correspond to our paper definition or were not accessible for us, resulting in approximately 170 papers left for our analysis. During the analysis some papers will also be identified as false positives, i.e. they are not related with the topic of AR, although they met the keyword criteria. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Paper classification table ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | After the literature review creation process from Brocke et al. (2009) (cf. blog xy) we are currently in Phase IV, as we began to analyse the papers we found during our search process. | ||
+ | Following this approach we created a paper classification table and used the so-called concept matrix from Webster and Watson (2002) as a reference, and adapted it slightly. In this table we divided the analyzed topics into multiple subtopics (cf. list below). There each paper was added with its metadata, e.g. title or bibliography, | ||
+ | |||
+ | A paper is represented by one row, containing the following information as columns, if available: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Common (Metadata of a paper) | ||
+ | * Full text accessible: If a paper is available in full text or not and therefore, if it can be included in our analysis | ||
+ | * Proceeding: Name of conference | ||
+ | * Year: Year of publication | ||
+ | * Paper based on our definition?: | ||
+ | * Title: Title of publication | ||
+ | * Survey: bibliography | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Research Matter (general overview over content of publication) | ||
+ | * System research/ | ||
+ | * Reason and description of content: description of the decision from the previous column and short summary of the publication’s content | ||
+ | * Name of presented application or method | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Classification: | ||
+ | * Classification: | ||
+ | * Classification: | ||
+ | * Classification: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Classification: | ||
+ | * Evaluation conducted?: if an evaluation was conducted in the publication | ||
+ | * Goal and description of evaluation | ||
+ | * Preliminary study conducted?: if a pilot or preliminary study was conducted in the publication | ||
+ | * Goal of preliminary study? | ||
+ | * Layer 1: based on Duenser, Grasset und Billinghurst (2008) (cf. blog article [[lehre: | ||
+ | * Layer 2: based on Duenser, Grasset und Billinghurst (2008) (cf. blog article [[lehre: | ||
+ | * Layer 3: based on Duenser, Grasset und Billinghurst (2008) (cf. blog article [[lehre: | ||
+ | * Experiment procedure: structure of evaluation, e.g. training session, tasks, post-questionnaire | ||
+ | * Amount of tasks and subtasks | ||
+ | * Number of Participants | ||
+ | * Participants’ metadata: age (median), gender, profession | ||
+ | * Duration of experiment | ||
+ | * Experiment design & group size: within-subject or between-subject design | ||
+ | * Field study or labor study: if the study took place in the labor or outside the labor | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Guidelines: Lessons Learned | ||
+ | * Issues of evaluation methods: observed problems, e.g. missing of some classification categories (e.g. for input devices like game controllers) or a vague description of participants | ||
+ | * Other | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | We divided the amount of papers between us three, resulting in approximately 56 papers for each of us to analyse. Our deadline for this analysis is targeted on February 7th and the finalisation of the analysis’ results on February 15th. The best approach for analysing the results will arise during our paper analysis. | ||
+ | |||
+ | That was all for today. See you next time! | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== References ==== | ||
+ | Brocke, Jan vom; Simons, Alexander; Niehaves, Bjoern; Niehaves, Bjorn; Reimer, Kai; Plattfaut, Ralf; and Cleven, Anne, | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | SEARCH PROCESS" | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dey, A., Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Duenser, A., Grasset, R., & Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Guest Editorial: | ||