Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung | Nächste ÜberarbeitungBeide Seiten der Revision | ||
lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g:2019-01-31_a_research_of_researches [31.01.2019 13:25] – intro scc64279 | lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g:2019-01-31_a_research_of_researches [31.01.2019 13:34] – scc64279 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
tags_ : blog, AR, publications, | tags_ : blog, AR, publications, | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hello everyone! | ||
+ | |||
In this blog article we would give an update about the progress of our state-of-the-art AR paper analysis. Within the last weeks we were busy creating a plan for selecting, and retrieving, sorting and analyzing state-of-the-art papers in the area of AR. Our methodology follows proposals from the literature that we have slightly adapted to conform to our requirements. | In this blog article we would give an update about the progress of our state-of-the-art AR paper analysis. Within the last weeks we were busy creating a plan for selecting, and retrieving, sorting and analyzing state-of-the-art papers in the area of AR. Our methodology follows proposals from the literature that we have slightly adapted to conform to our requirements. | ||
The goal of the paper analysis is to analyse and collect, which AR technologies were used in state-of-the-art AR papers and especially how these applications were evaluated, so that we could indicate the frequency of the used methods, identify gaps and trends and compare them with results from previous work. | The goal of the paper analysis is to analyse and collect, which AR technologies were used in state-of-the-art AR papers and especially how these applications were evaluated, so that we could indicate the frequency of the used methods, identify gaps and trends and compare them with results from previous work. | ||
- | We already defined our selection criteria in the blog article “Selecting state-of-the-art papers (2018-12-12)”. As already described there, we analyzed publications from the ISMAR and CHI, two major conferences in the field of Augmented Reality. Based on Duenser, Grasset, & Billinghurst (2008) the ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore are two main publishers in the field of AR. Therefore they used these as sources for their paper analysis. | + | We already defined our selection criteria in the blog article |
Regarding the time interval for our publication analysis we finally decided us for the years 2015 to 2017, succeeding the work of Dey, Billinghurst, | Regarding the time interval for our publication analysis we finally decided us for the years 2015 to 2017, succeeding the work of Dey, Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Paper acquisition ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | After defining our paper selection criteria we continued our research with the acquisition of the publications and the creation of a corpus. | ||
+ | Based on that, we decided to collect papers based on a set of keywords entered in the search engine of the publishers’ websites. To be able to compare our methodology with approaches from the literature, we decided to directly take over the keywords from Duenser, Grasset, & Billinghurst (2008), which were also used by other surveys in the field of AR (Dey et al. , 2016). They are listed in the following: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | |||
+ | As the focus of Duenser, Grasset, & Billinghurst (2008) lied primarily on user evaluations, | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the retrieval of the publications we used the search engine on the websites of IEEE [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Based on this approach we found approximately 360 papers related to AR, where approximately 170 could be excluded, as they did not correspond to our paper definition or were not accessible for us, resulting in approximately 170 papers left for our analysis. During the analysis some papers will also be identified as false positives, i.e. they are not related with the topic of AR, although they met the keyword criteria. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||