Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g:2019-02-07_big_update_incoming [07.02.2019 06:54] – Erstellt mit dem Formular lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g wom62811 | lehre:ws18:fsm_18ws:group_g:2019-02-07_big_update_incoming [07.02.2019 07:34] (aktuell) – wom62811 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
tags_ : blog, update, classification, | tags_ : blog, update, classification, | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Today we want to present you a few updates we had to make regarding our classification of technologies and evaluation methods. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Classification of technologies ====== | ||
+ | During our analysis and also through a meeting with our supervisor, we noticed that some phrases in the schemas are not well chosen and one category | ||
+ | Here are our final schemas for the classification of AR technologies after Display, Interface and Tracking. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Further we decided to classify the area of an AR application too and determined the following categories: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Assembly and Inspection\\ | ||
+ | (Dey et al., 2016; Papagiannakis, | ||
+ | * Education\\ | ||
+ | (Billinghurst, | ||
+ | * Culture, Arts and Architecture\\ | ||
+ | (Billinghurst, | ||
+ | * Collaboration\\ | ||
+ | (Dey et al., 2016; Papagiannakis, | ||
+ | * Entertainment and Gaming\\ | ||
+ | (Billinghurst, | ||
+ | * Interaction\\ | ||
+ | (Papagiannakis, | ||
+ | * Medical\\ | ||
+ | (Carmigniani et al., 2011; Dey et al., 2016; Van Krevelen and Poelman, 2010) | ||
+ | * Navigation and Driving\\ | ||
+ | (Dey et al., 2016; Papagiannakis, | ||
+ | * Advertising and commercial\\ | ||
+ | (Billinghurst, | ||
+ | * Tourism and exploration\\ | ||
+ | (Dey et al. ,2016) | ||
+ | * Science\\ | ||
+ | (Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Classification of evaluation (methods) ====== | ||
+ | Regarding the classification of evaluation methods we made a lot of changes and improvements. | ||
+ | * We don’t classify only the evaluation method anymore. We added items that are in our paper classification table already (we presented in our last blog). For example informations about the participants, | ||
+ | * The classification is not separated into three layers anymore, rather the layout and organisation is adapted from the classification schema for the AR technologie. | ||
+ | * Before the update our schema was mainly based on the survey Duenser et al. (2008) conducted. Now we include three additional references, including two AR surveys. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Also this schema will be adapted by us during our analysis, so we will add the exact method (last item by “evaluation method”) in the correct category. | ||
+ | Examples: | ||
+ | We add every particular questionnaire as subcategories under this item ( evaluation method → subjective measurements → questionnaire). At the moment we found following questionnaires that were conducted: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Likert-Scales | ||
+ | * matching question (left) to the answer (right) | ||
+ | * open-ended questions | ||
+ | * Social Presence in Gaming Questionnaire (SPGQ) | ||
+ | * System Usability Scale (SUS) | ||
+ | * user experience questionnaire | ||
+ | * Attrakdiff questionnaire | ||
+ | * before-after comparison: z.B: lernverhalten | ||
+ | * UTAUT2 model | ||
+ | * Game Experience Questionnaire (GEQ) | ||
+ | * Task Load Index (TLX) | ||
+ | |||
+ | We add the subcategory “informal discussion” under the supercategory “informal evaluations”. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Missing categories ====== | ||
+ | If we found further categories for the area of an AR application, | ||
+ | We will present them in our paper as a lesson learned aspect and will discuss them in our analysis of the results of the state-of-the-art paper analysis. | ||
+ | Maybe it is possible to draw conclusions when we compare our results to the already conducted AR related surveys. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== References ====== | ||
+ | ===== Classification of AR technologies ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Azuma, R. T. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 6(4), 355–385. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Carmigniani, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In H. Das (Hrsg.) (S. 282–292). Gehalten auf der Photonics for Industrial Applications, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Papagiannakis, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Schmalstieg, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Van Krevelen, R., & Poelman, R. (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Classification of AR application area ===== | ||
+ | Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Carmigniani, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dey, A., Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Papagiannakis, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Van Krevelen, R., & Poelman, R. (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Classification of AR evaluation ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Edward, J., Ii, S., & Gabbard, J. L. (2005).Survey of User-Based Experimentation in augmented Reality. In In 1st International Conference on VirtualReality, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dünser,A., Grasset, R., & Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dünser,A., & Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dey, A., Billinghurst, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||