no way to compare when less than two revisions
Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| — | lehre:ws20:fsm_20ws:group_a:2021-02-25_paper_handed_in_for_peer_review [25.02.2021 09:27] (aktuell) – Erstellt mit dem Formular lehre:ws20:fsm_20ws:group_a hal35337 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| + | ---- datatemplateentry blog2021 ---- | ||
| + | template | ||
| + | title : Paper handed in for peer review | ||
| + | description | ||
| + | date_date | ||
| + | bygroup | ||
| + | tags_ : blog, paper, elearning | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Following our last blogpost, we had our last participation on the 9th of February. In the meantime we already developed tools to download and sort the content of our database in order to combine this data (permutation and timestamps) with the questionnaire results. The results were already being marked. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Starting at the 7th of February with the creation of an overleaf project, we got to writing the first chapter of our paper. We also started with the statistical data analysis after all tests were marked on the 17th of February. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The process of testing different hypotheses and combinations of permutations went on while we wrote the remaining chapters of our paper. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We gave a first draft to Andreas Schmid at the 22nd of February and got feedback on the same day. We implemented this feedback on the 23rd of February and handed the paper in on the 24th of February, with the result that we found no significant influence of technical video quality on contente understanding. This holds true for all content and permutation combinations. | ||